Last Updated on July 29, 2026 by Daniel Globe
Choosing an airline is easy. Deciding whether to trust its safety record takes a closer look at official oversight, accident investigations, aircraft, training requirements, and current events. SAS has operated since 1946, but its history includes both decades of routine service and incidents that deserve clear, balanced coverage.
Quick Answer
Current evidence supports viewing SAS as a generally safe major European airline. It operates under strict EU aviation rules, is absent from the June 2026 EU Air Safety List, and holds a 7/7 AirlineRatings safety score. However, its history includes the fatal 2001 Linate collision and a serious 2026 incident still under investigation.
SAS, legally known as Scandinavian Airlines System, is a long-established Scandinavian network carrier serving destinations in Europe, North America, and Asia. The airline’s first scheduled flight took place in September 1946.
SAS became a member of the SkyTeam alliance on September 1, 2024. Alliance membership expands connecting options, but passengers should still check which airline will actually operate each flight because a codeshare ticket may carry an SAS flight number while another carrier operates the aircraft.
Key Takeaways
- SAS operates within the European aviation-safety framework and under oversight from the relevant national authorities.
- SAS does not appear on the European Union Air Safety List updated on June 9, 2026.
- AirlineRatings currently gives SAS a 7/7 safety score, although that is a commercial rating rather than a regulatory approval.
- The airline’s history includes the survivable 1991 Flight 751 accident and the fatal 2001 Linate runway collision.
- A serious February 2026 Brussels incident remains under investigation, so preliminary information should not be treated as a final finding.
- SAS operates Airbus narrow-body and wide-body aircraft alongside regional Embraer, Bombardier, and ATR aircraft.
What’s in This Article
- Safety Measures and Regulatory Oversight
- Accident History and Investigations
- Fleet Information and Maintenance
- Safety Ratings and Regulatory Indicators
- Pilot Training and Experience
- Passenger Feedback and Reviews
- How to Check SAS Safety Before Booking
- So, Is SAS Airlines Safe?
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Sources
Safety Measures and Regulatory Oversight
European Safety Rules and Operating Oversight
SAS flights operate within the European aviation framework established through European Union law and rules maintained by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency. These rules cover areas such as commercial air operations, aircraft airworthiness, crew licensing, training, duty limitations, reporting, and operator management systems.
EASA creates common technical rules and supports standardized oversight across Europe. It is more accurate, however, to say that SAS operates under the EASA framework and the supervision of relevant national authorities than to say the airline holds one general “EASA safety certificate.” National authorities normally issue and oversee an airline’s operating approvals.
Proactive Risk Management
European commercial-air-transport operators must use a management system that identifies hazards, assesses operational risks, tracks safety performance, and supports corrective action. This approach is commonly called a safety management system, or SMS.
An SMS does not eliminate every hazard. Its purpose is to help an airline detect patterns in reports, maintenance findings, flight data, and daily operations before those patterns contribute to a more serious event.
Emergency Preparation
Flight and cabin crews receive initial and recurrent training for normal operations, emergency procedures, evacuation, fire response, first aid, and communication under pressure. Aircraft also carry certified safety and navigation systems appropriate to their type and intended operation.
Regulatory compliance is an important safety indicator, but it should be considered alongside current operating restrictions, official investigation records, fleet information, and the identity of the carrier operating the flight.
Accident History and Investigations

SAS has operated for decades, and most of its flights have concluded without a serious event. A useful safety review must still present the airline’s notable accidents and recent incidents in full rather than relying only on a general statement that the record is strong.
| Date and Event | Outcome | What the Official Record Shows |
|---|---|---|
| December 27, 1991 SAS Flight 751 |
All 129 occupants survived. Ninety-two people were injured. | Clear ice broke from the wing-root area after takeoff and entered both engines, causing compressor surges and loss of thrust. The aircraft made a forced landing near Stockholm. Investigators also examined inadequate procedures, information, and crew knowledge related to the hazard. |
| October 8, 2001 SAS Flight 686 at Milan Linate |
All 110 people aboard the SAS MD-87 died. Four occupants of a Cessna and four people on the ground also died, for 118 fatalities in total. | The SAS aircraft had been cleared for takeoff when the Cessna entered the active runway. Italy’s investigation identified multiple contributing failures involving airport layout, signs, markings, procedures, air-traffic control, and surface-movement safeguards. |
| February 5, 2026 SAS Flight SK2590 at Brussels |
No injuries and no reported aircraft damage. | An Airbus A320 began accelerating on taxiway E1 instead of the assigned runway. The crew rejected the takeoff after recognizing the problem around the 100-knot callout. The aircraft reached a reported maximum of 126 knots. Belgium classified the occurrence as a serious incident, and the investigation remains open. |
Warning: The Belgian report on the February 2026 Brussels incident is preliminary. It describes the known sequence of events but does not establish a final cause, assign blame, or replace the eventual final investigation report.
Aircraft investigations generally follow the rules in International Civil Aviation Organization Annex 13. The state where an accident or serious incident occurs normally conducts or delegates the investigation. That is why the Swedish Accident Investigation Authority handled Flight 751, Italy’s National Agency for Flight Safety investigated Linate, and Belgium’s Air Accident Investigation Unit is responsible for the 2026 Brussels occurrence.
The purpose of a safety investigation is prevention. An official report examines technical, environmental, organizational, procedural, and human factors so regulators and operators can reduce the chance of a similar event.
Fleet Information and Maintenance
SAS uses a combination of narrow-body, wide-body, and regional aircraft. Exact counts can change as aircraft enter service, leave the fleet, or move between operating companies, so aircraft categories are more reliable than a fixed count in a general safety article.
| Aircraft Family | Body Type | Typical SAS Role |
|---|---|---|
| Airbus A319, A320, A320neo, and A321LR | Narrow-body | Short- and medium-haul services, with the A321LR also suited to selected longer routes |
| Airbus A330-300 and A350-900 | Wide-body | Long-haul international services |
| Embraer E195LR and Bombardier CRJ900 | Regional jet | Regional and lower-demand European routes |
| ATR 72-600 | Regional turboprop | Short regional routes |
SAS also lists a specially configured Boeing 737-700 for medical-evacuation work. That aircraft is not representative of an ordinary scheduled passenger booking.
Maintenance programs must follow approved airworthiness requirements, manufacturer instructions, mandatory directives, and defined inspection intervals. Work ranges from routine line checks to deeper scheduled inspections tied to aircraft age, flight hours, and operating cycles. Certified personnel and approved maintenance organizations must document the work and return the aircraft to service.
Current Fleet Renewal
Fleet renewal is ongoing. In July 2025, SAS announced a firm order for 45 Embraer E195-E2 aircraft, with purchase rights for 10 more. Initial deliveries are planned for late 2027, so those aircraft should not yet be presented as part of the in-service fleet.
On June 30, 2026, SAS also announced a widebody investment covering up to 40 Airbus aircraft. The plan introduces the Airbus A330-900neo and includes additional A330-300 capacity while continuing the airline’s A320neo renewal work. Newer aircraft can improve fuel use, reliability, and cabin technology, but aircraft age by itself does not determine whether a flight is safe. Proper maintenance and operation remain essential at every fleet age.
Safety Ratings and Regulatory Indicators
AirlineRatings currently gives SAS a 7/7 safety score. That is the publisher’s highest safety tier and uses factors from its own methodology, including operating restrictions and accident-related criteria.
The score is useful as one comparison tool, but AirlineRatings is a commercial publisher rather than an aviation regulator. Its score should not be described as an EASA certification or a guarantee about a future flight.
SAS also does not appear on the European Union Air Safety List updated on June 9, 2026. The list identifies airlines subject to EU operating bans or restrictions because of unresolved safety-oversight concerns.
As of June 2026, SAS is not on the EU Air Safety List, while AirlineRatings separately awards the carrier a 7/7 commercial safety score. These are positive but different indicators.
Pro Tip: Check the date and methodology behind any airline rating. Also verify the operating carrier shown on your booking, especially when the itinerary includes a codeshare partner.
Pilot Training and Experience

Pilot competence is central to commercial-airline safety. Under European rules, pilots must hold the appropriate licence, medical qualification, aircraft type rating, and recent-experience credentials for their assigned duties.
Airline training goes beyond accumulating a vague number of flight hours. It includes operator conversion training, aircraft-specific procedures, simulator exercises, recurrent training, proficiency checks, emergency scenarios, and route or airport qualifications where required.
SAS flight crews also train in crew resource management, or CRM. CRM focuses on communication, leadership, workload management, situational awareness, decision-making, and effective challenge between crew members. These skills become especially important when a technical problem or unexpected operational condition develops quickly.
Training cannot prevent every human error. Recurrent checking, reporting systems, standard operating procedures, cockpit design, air-traffic-control safeguards, and airport infrastructure all work together as layers of protection.
Passenger Feedback and Reviews
Passenger reviews can reveal useful service details, including cabin cleanliness, communication, staff professionalism, boarding organization, and how calmly a crew handles delays or turbulence. Those observations may affect a traveler’s comfort and confidence.
They do not establish an airline’s technical safety performance. For example, Skytrax’s SAS rating evaluates products and service features such as seats, catering, cabin presentation, and staff service. It is not an accident-risk assessment or regulatory audit.
Note: A smooth flight does not prove that an airline is safer, and turbulence does not prove that it is unsafe. Weather, route, aircraft movement, and service quality are different from regulatory compliance and long-term operational risk.
Pandemic-era mask rules and enhanced sanitation programs should also be described as historical measures unless a current route or public-health rule specifically requires them. They are not evidence of the airline’s present technical safety status.
How to Check SAS Safety Before Booking
- Confirm the operating carrier. Look for wording such as “operated by” on the booking page. The marketing airline and the airline flying the aircraft may differ.
- Check current operating restrictions. Search the European Commission’s EU Air Safety List rather than relying on an old blog post or screenshot.
- Read official investigation records carefully. Confirm whether a report is preliminary or final. Preliminary reports provide early facts but may not establish cause.
- Review the rating method. A score is more useful when the publisher explains its criteria and shows when the record was last updated.
- Separate safety from service. Seat comfort, delays, food, and customer support matter, but they do not measure maintenance quality or accident risk.
- Follow onboard instructions. Read the safety card, locate the nearest usable exit, and keep your seat belt fastened while seated.
So, Is SAS Airlines Safe?
Based on current regulatory status, operating requirements, fleet information, and independent rating data, SAS can reasonably be regarded as a generally safe major European carrier. It is not on the current EU Air Safety List, operates under European aviation rules, and has a 7/7 AirlineRatings safety score.
That conclusion should not erase the airline’s history. The 2001 Linate collision was a fatal disaster, even though the official investigation identified broad airport and air-traffic-system failures while the SAS crew had takeoff clearance. The February 2026 Brussels taxiway event also shows why current investigation records matter, although no injuries occurred and the final cause has not yet been determined.
No airline can guarantee zero risk. The strongest answer is therefore not that SAS is perfectly safe, but that the available evidence supports confidence in the carrier while still requiring an honest account of past accidents, recent incidents, and the limits of any safety score.
Safety is separate from trip convenience. Once you have checked the operating carrier and current records, choosing the best carry-on luggage for international travel can make the journey easier without being treated as part of the airline’s safety assessment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is SAS Airlines a safe airline to fly with?
Current evidence supports regarding SAS as a generally safe major European airline. It operates under European aviation rules, is not on the June 2026 EU Air Safety List, and currently has a 7/7 AirlineRatings safety score. No airline can guarantee a risk-free flight, and SAS’s full history includes both fatal and nonfatal events.
What safety measures does SAS Airlines have in place?
SAS must comply with European requirements covering aircraft airworthiness, maintenance, operational procedures, crew licensing, recurrent training, emergency preparation, reporting, and safety management. Relevant national authorities oversee the airline’s operating approvals within the wider EASA regulatory framework.
Has SAS Airlines had any major safety incidents?
Yes. All 129 occupants survived the 1991 Flight 751 accident, although 92 were injured. In 2001, SAS Flight 686 collided with another aircraft at Milan Linate, causing 118 total fatalities. In February 2026, an SAS A320 began a takeoff roll on a Brussels taxiway; the crew stopped the aircraft, no one was injured, and the investigation remains open.
How does SAS compare with other airlines for safety?
SAS operates under the same broad European regulatory framework as other major EU carriers and currently receives the maximum 7/7 safety score from AirlineRatings. Direct comparisons remain difficult because serious accidents are rare, airline networks differ, and commercial rating methods are not identical. The same evidence-based approach should be used when evaluating any safe-airline claim.
Where can I verify SAS Airlines’ safety record?
Check the European Commission’s EU Air Safety List, official accident-investigation reports, EASA’s operating rules, the SAS fleet page, and a rating provider that publishes its methodology. Aviation Safety Network can help locate historical events, but official final reports should be the primary source when available.
Safety Disclaimer: This article provides general information and does not guarantee the safety of a particular flight. Airline operations, restrictions, fleets, and investigation findings can change. Confirm the operating carrier and consult current regulatory notices, official investigation authorities, and airline communications before making a travel decision.
SAS has decades of operating experience, a current absence from the EU Air Safety List, and several positive regulatory and commercial indicators. Travelers should balance those facts with the airline’s complete accident history and the unresolved status of the 2026 investigation. If you plan a flight with SAS, verify the operating carrier and current information before completing the booking.
Sources
- European Union Aviation Safety Agency — Air Operations — European operating, management-system, and training framework.
- European Commission — EU Air Safety List — Current EU operating bans and restrictions, updated June 9, 2026.
- SAS Group — The Fleet — Aircraft families currently identified by SAS.
- Swedish Accident Investigation Authority — SAS Flight 751 Final Report — Official findings for the December 27, 1991 accident.
- Italian National Agency for Flight Safety — Linate Final Report — Official investigation of the October 8, 2001 runway collision.
- Belgian Air Accident Investigation Unit — 2026 Preliminary Report — Initial facts concerning the Brussels taxiway takeoff incident.
