Last Updated on July 28, 2026 by Daniel Globe
Avianca is one of the world’s longest-running airline brands, with roots dating to 1919. Its history includes serious accidents, especially before modern safety-management systems became standard. The more useful question for travelers today is whether Avianca’s current oversight, audit status, fleet, maintenance, crew training, and recent record support choosing the airline now.
Quick Answer
Yes. Based on its current regulatory oversight, reported IOSA recertification, modern mainline fleet, and long period without a fatal passenger accident under the core Avianca brand, Avianca is generally considered a reasonable airline to fly. That does not mean incidents never occur or that any airline can guarantee a risk-free trip.
Key Takeaways
- Avianca’s best-known fatal accident, Flight 052, occurred on January 25, 1990, and killed 73 of the 158 people aboard.
- Avianca reports IOSA recertification, while IATA’s audit framework covers flight operations, maintenance, cabin operations, ground handling, dispatch, cargo, and management systems.
- Colombia’s Aerocivil is Avianca’s primary national safety regulator and conducts certification, inspection, and continuing oversight of commercial operators.
- Avianca’s passenger fleet is centered on Airbus A320-family aircraft and Boeing 787 Dreamliners; fleet age alone does not prove whether an airline is safe.
- Non-fatal incidents still occur, so safety should be judged through oversight, transparent investigations, audit status, and long-term operational performance—not customer-service reviews alone.
Note: Safety records are backward-looking and cannot guarantee a future flight. On a codeshare itinerary, check the “operated by” line because the operating carrier—not only the airline selling the ticket—controls the aircraft and crew.
Avianca Safety Record and Accident History
Avianca’s history should not be ignored. The airline experienced several fatal accidents during the 20th century, when aircraft technology, crew-resource management, navigation, communications, and regulatory systems were less developed than they are today.
The best-documented example is Avianca Flight 052. On January 25, 1990, the Boeing 707 ran out of fuel after extended holding and a missed approach near New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport. The aircraft crashed in Cove Neck, New York, killing 73 people and injuring many survivors. The National Transportation Safety Board cited inadequate fuel management and failure to clearly communicate the emergency fuel situation, while also identifying contributing problems in traffic-flow management and standardized fuel-emergency terminology.
The original claim that Avianca had “no fatal accidents since 2004” used an unsupported cutoff. No later fatal passenger accident involving the core Avianca brand was identified in the sources reviewed. Because airline groups, subsidiaries, and operating certificates can change over time, this should be described carefully rather than presented as an absolute guarantee covering every affiliated operation.
IATA reported 51 accidents among 38.7 million commercial flights in 2025—an all-accident rate of 1.32 per million flights. Airline safety is best judged through long-term systems and oversight, not a single incident or review.
Safety Measures and Protocols
Avianca says it uses a Safety Management System, or SMS, to identify hazards, assess risk, track safety events, and apply corrective action. An SMS is not a promise that nothing will go wrong. It is a structured process for finding risk before it becomes an accident and learning from events that do occur.
This approach matches the principles in ICAO safety-management guidance. Avianca’s latest corporate responsibility report also states that the airline expanded safety audits and unannounced inspections while maintaining its SMS and obtaining IOSA recertification.
Flight-data monitoring can support this work by helping an airline identify unstable approaches, excessive speeds, hard landings, fuel-management trends, or other deviations. However, Avianca does not publish enough detail for an outside article to verify every internal monitoring tool, threshold, or corrective process. The accurate conclusion is that the airline reports using formal, data-informed safety controls and is subject to outside audit and regulatory review.
Maintenance and Inspection Procedures

Aircraft maintenance is controlled by approved programs rather than one simple inspection interval. Tasks may be triggered by flight hours, flight cycles, calendar time, component condition, manufacturer instructions, airworthiness directives, or findings from earlier inspections. The FAA Aviation Maintenance Technician Handbook explains these general maintenance and airworthiness principles, although Avianca’s specific program is approved and overseen under the rules that apply to its operators.
Colombia’s Aerocivil states that it certifies commercial air operators, issues operating specifications, conducts continuing surveillance, and checks whether operators retain the technical ability required by their certificates. That oversight includes operational and airworthiness inspections.
Avianca does not publicly disclose every work card, component limit, spare-parts stock level, or heavy-check schedule. It is therefore safer to say that the airline must follow approved maintenance and continuing-airworthiness requirements than to make unsupported claims about a “state-of-the-art” facility or a guaranteed absence of technical failures.
Pro Tip: A delay, return to gate, diversion, or aircraft swap can be inconvenient, but it may also show that crews and maintenance teams are responding conservatively to a technical concern rather than accepting avoidable risk.
Pilot Training and Experience
Pilot training is an important part of airline safety, but the original table’s claims of “1,000 hours” and “50 hours” of simulator training were not tied to a reliable Avianca source. Airline-wide requirements vary by role, aircraft type, previous experience, national licensing rules, and the operator’s approved training program.
| Training Area | What Can Be Said Reliably |
| Initial Qualification | Pilots must complete licensing, aircraft-type, operator, and route or operational training applicable to their position. |
| Simulator and Recurrent Checks | Airline pilots undergo recurring proficiency, emergency-procedure, and aircraft-systems training under an approved program. |
| Instrument and Multi-Engine Privileges | Crews must hold the qualifications and medical certification required for the aircraft and operation they perform. |
| Public Data Limit | No reliable public source confirms a universal 1,000-hour hiring threshold or exactly 50 simulator hours for every Avianca pilot. |
The IOSA Standards Manual includes flight operations, operational control, maintenance, cabin operations, ground handling, cargo, security, and organization and management systems. IOSA registration is therefore a meaningful audit signal, but it does not publish each individual pilot’s experience or replace national regulatory oversight.
Emergency Response Preparedness
Airlines need plans for aircraft accidents, medical events, security threats, dangerous-goods events, severe weather, system outages, and family assistance. Those plans typically define who takes control, how the airline communicates, how it works with airports and emergency services, and how the operation recovers.
Avianca’s internal emergency manuals and drill records are not fully public, so an outside article should not claim detailed performance that cannot be checked. What can be verified is that emergency response, cabin operations, operational control, and management systems fall within the broader safety and audit framework applied to a large international carrier.
Warning: Follow crew instructions immediately during turbulence or an emergency. Keep your seat belt fastened whenever seated, even when the sign is off, because clear-air turbulence can occur with little warning.
Fleet Age and Upkeep

Current Fleet
Avianca’s official fleet page says the airline operates more than 140 aircraft. Its passenger operation is centered on Airbus A320-family aircraft for short- and medium-haul routes and Boeing 787 Dreamliners for long-haul service. Avianca Cargo also operates Airbus A330 freighters.
Fleet Age and Safety
Avianca reported in January 2026 that its average fleet age had risen slightly to about 9.5 years. That does not, by itself, make the fleet unsafe. Commercial aircraft can remain safe for decades when they are maintained, inspected, repaired, and operated within approved limits. A newer aircraft may offer efficiency and diagnostic improvements, but maintenance quality, crew performance, operating discipline, and regulatory surveillance matter more than a simple average-age figure.
Maintenance and Upkeep
Avianca has been adding A320neo aircraft, expanding its Boeing 787 operation, and simplifying parts of its fleet. Standardization can support training, spare-parts planning, maintenance expertise, and operational consistency, but it should not be treated as proof that technical problems cannot happen.
Minimizing Risks
The strongest safety signal is not that an aircraft is new; it is that the operator has effective maintenance controls, qualified personnel, reliable reporting, regulatory surveillance, and a willingness to delay or remove an aircraft from service when a condition needs attention.
Safety Ratings and Certifications
Avianca’s corporate responsibility reporting states that it obtained recertification in the IATA Operational Safety Audit registry. IOSA is an internationally recognized audit of an airline’s operational management and control systems. It is a useful screening signal because it tests defined standards across major operating areas.
IOSA is not a government operating certificate, a zero-accident guarantee, or a substitute for continuing oversight. Registration also has to be maintained, so travelers or editors should check the live IATA registry rather than relying forever on an old article or badge.
The FAA’s International Aviation Safety Assessment program lists Colombia as Category 1, meaning the FAA has found that the country’s civil aviation authority meets ICAO standards for safety oversight. IASA evaluates the country’s oversight system; it is not a direct score for one airline.
Customer Reviews and Feedback
Avianca receives mixed passenger reviews about delays, communication, baggage, seating, fares, and customer service. Those reports can be useful when judging comfort and service reliability, but they are weak evidence for technical flight safety.
A traveler may describe a delay, turbulence, a firm landing, or a cabin-service problem as “unsafe” even when the event does not show a regulatory or operational safety failure. Conversely, a pleasant flight does not prove that an airline’s safety systems are strong. For safety research, give more weight to official investigation reports, regulatory status, audit registration, and documented accident history.
Aviation Industry Standards and Regulations
Avianca is primarily overseen by Colombia’s Civil Aviation Authority, Aerocivil. Aerocivil certifies operators, issues operating specifications, conducts inspections, monitors continued technical competence, and enforces Colombian aviation rules.
The International Civil Aviation Organization does not act as Avianca’s day-to-day airline regulator. ICAO creates international Standards and Recommended Practices for member states. Colombia then applies those standards through its own laws, certification, licensing, surveillance, and enforcement system.
The FAA also does not replace Aerocivil as Avianca’s home regulator. The FAA assesses Colombia’s oversight system through IASA and applies relevant U.S. requirements to foreign carriers operating to and from the United States. This distinction is important because “regulated by ICAO and the FAA” is too broad and can mislead readers.
Recent Incidents and Accidents
Avianca has experienced non-fatal incidents in recent years. For example, Colombia’s accident-investigation authority completed a report on an April 17, 2024 runway-incursion event at Bogotá involving two Avianca Airbus A320neo aircraft. No one was killed in that event.
These events should not be hidden, but they also should not be presented as proof that the airline is broadly unsafe. Commercial aviation systems depend on reporting and investigation of incidents, including events that do not cause injury. The useful questions are whether the event was reported, investigated, understood, and followed by corrective action.
Is Avianca Airlines Safe for Travel?
Based on the evidence available as of July 28, 2026, Avianca is generally a reasonable airline to choose. It operates under continuing Aerocivil oversight, Colombia holds Category 1 status in the FAA’s IASA program, Avianca reports current IOSA recertification, and the main passenger fleet uses widely operated Airbus A320-family and Boeing 787 aircraft.
Its historical record includes major tragedies, especially Flight 052 in 1990, and non-fatal incidents continue to occur. Those facts argue for a balanced answer rather than a marketing claim. No airline can promise absolute safety, but the current oversight and audit signals do not show a clear reason for an average traveler to avoid Avianca on safety grounds alone.
Before booking, confirm which airline operates every segment, review current government travel or airspace notices for the route, and separate service complaints from verified safety findings. If you are comparing carriers, use the same standards for each one.
For booking rules and website policies, you can review TakeTravelInfo’s Terms and Conditions. Those terms may explain site use and booking-related limitations, but they are not evidence of Avianca’s operational safety.
Sources
- National Transportation Safety Board — Avianca Flight 052 — accident facts, fatalities, probable cause, and contributing factors.
- Avianca — Our Fleet — current aircraft count and fleet families.
- Avianca Corporate Responsibility Report — SMS, safety audits, inspections, and IOSA recertification.
- IATA — IOSA Standards Manual — audit scope and operating areas covered by IOSA.
- Aerocivil — Air Transport Operator Surveillance — certification, inspection, and continuing safety oversight in Colombia.
- IATA 2025 Safety Report release — current global commercial-aviation accident statistics and context.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Avianca Airlines a safe airline to fly with?
Current oversight and audit signals support Avianca as a reasonable airline choice. It operates under Aerocivil oversight, reports IOSA recertification, and uses a mainstream Airbus and Boeing fleet. No airline, however, can guarantee a risk-free flight.
What safety measures does Avianca have in place?
Avianca reports using a Safety Management System, safety audits, unannounced inspections, operational monitoring, approved maintenance programs, recurrent crew training, and emergency-response processes. Its IOSA audit status provides an outside check across major operating areas.
Has Avianca had any major safety incidents in the past?
Yes. Avianca’s history includes fatal accidents. Flight 052 crashed near New York on January 25, 1990, after fuel exhaustion, killing 73 people. Avianca has also had more recent non-fatal incidents that were reported or investigated.
How does Avianca help protect passengers?
Passenger safety depends on multiple layers: aircraft maintenance, qualified crews, dispatch and weather decisions, air traffic control, cabin procedures, airport emergency services, regulatory oversight, and incident reporting. Avianca is responsible for the airline-controlled parts of that system.
Who regulates Avianca Airlines?
Colombia’s Aerocivil is the primary national aviation authority for Avianca’s Colombian operations. ICAO sets international standards for states, while the FAA evaluates Colombia’s oversight system and applies relevant U.S. rules when Avianca operates to or from the United States.
Is Avianca IOSA registered?
Avianca’s latest corporate responsibility reporting states that it obtained IOSA recertification. Because registration must be maintained, check the live IATA IOSA Registry for the latest status before relying on an older article.
Does Avianca’s fleet age make it safe or unsafe?
No single fleet-age number can answer that question. Avianca reported an average age of about 9.5 years in January 2026. Proper maintenance, approved repairs, crew performance, safety reporting, and regulatory oversight matter more than age alone.
